Wednesday, August 19, 2009

Cuisenaire rods - a purchase that was worth it.

Right before we moved, I sold a lot of stuff on eBay. One of the things I bought with the proceeds was a box of wooden Cuisenaire rods.

(Hannah's first time playing with the rods)

These have been on my wish list for several years now. This seemed like the perfect time to buy them - I had the money, they were up for a good price on eBay, and I thought that Hannah was finally old enough to enjoy them. (I didn't think about Ainsley because I have some set thoughts about math and one of them is that math is a school-y subject, and only a child of a certain age would be ready for toys that are made to teach math concepts. I have some unschooling of myself left to do.)

(Ainsley's first time playing with the rods)

When I put them out the first time, both girls approached them in their own characteristic way. Hannah asked how she was supposed to play with them, Ainsley dumped them out and started building stuff.

I didn't answer Hannah directly. I started messing around with them, making daisies and staircases and modern art and while I did that, I mentioned that the rods were made with specific measurements that fit together in interesting ways. She started doing her own thing, and we were off.
She ended up, as she usually does, ending up doing what the makers of the rods intended children to do with the rods - making mathematical connections.

Every time since then that we've gotten them out, it's gone the same way.

Ainsley builds things - buildings, farms, playgrounds, bridges ... And I've been surprised at the mathematical discoveries she makes from non-directed play. The bridge supports have to be the same size, or it won't work. The pigs have to be smaller than the horses who can't be too big too fit in the barns. The parents in the playground are taller than the kids, whose size has to be adjusted to fit onto the swings. Little things, but quite striking when you watch her little mind work them out.

Hannah pushes different ones together and tries to find which other rods will line up exactly on the side. Then she adds some to the top of the second row and makes the first row and a third row equal. She makes up games and recruits me to play with her. She measures different things with the rods, trying to use as few rods as possible to measure the length of something.

Grayson's little regimental soul is fulfilled with lots of colored sticks and a box full of dividers to put them into.

So if these have been on your 'maybe' list or your wish list and you get a chance to get them, my vote is to give them a try.

Right now, my children just having fun playing with them, but if I notice a desire for more, I have this to check out.

Math is the one area of homeschooling that I have to remind myself to calm down about. Very nervewracking.

Tuesday, August 18, 2009

The Octopus' Happy Life In His Cottage and Sad Death (which was also in his cottage).

Hannah cut the legs off of one of her pairs of pants to make shorts. I'm not sure why she didn't just wear one of her pairs of shorts, but I wasn't home at the time, so by the time I got home it was a done deal.

She took the legs to her daddy and told him "We need to make something with these." So they made puppets. They used buttons from their button jars and ribbon and sticks from their Creation Station (a box with 'stuff' (scrap ribbons, sticks, game pieces, puzzle pieces, plastic lids, lots o' stuff).

Ainsley's is a ghost. Hannah's is an octopus. And I got a puppet show out of the whole deal.

Introducing Octopus.
(he had stage fright)

"Once upon a time there was an octopus.
He was exploring the ocean and came to an octopus cottage. "How lucky am I?!?" said the octopus. (He was very lucky, by the way, Mother. There aren't very many octopus cottages in the ocean.) So he settled into the cottage and ate all of the food he could find.

Now here's the very scary part, Mother. Don't be scared.
A SHARK found his cottage and it tried to eat him, but he wouldn't let it. He sprayed inky black stuff ALL OVER the shark and he said GO AWAY SHARK!!! and the shark went away."

Ainsley: "AND THEN THE GHOST CAME! Hi, shark!"
Hannah: "I'm not a shark, Ainser, I'm an octopus."

Ainsley: "... ... ... ...BOO!"

Hannah: (trying her best to ignore the ghost stealing the show) "So then the octopus had lots of children in the cottage and they all grew up and he was a Grandpa Octopus."
Ainsley: "A grandpocopuss? What a grandpocopuss?"

Hannah: "No, Ainser, A Grandpa Octo... Oh, you're frustrating me."

Ainsley: "The ghost said goo'bye. Goo'bye ocopuss!" (ghost exits stage right)

Hannah: "Thank goodness. Now, here's the very sad part. He died.

The end."

There was an encore, of course. Several, to be honest. And many more to come, I'm sure.

Monday, August 17, 2009

Our first caterpillar-to-moth experience.

Back on July 21, Hannah discovered this little guy in her flower garden.

I was sure that he was going to be a huge, fantastically beautiful butterfly and excitedly looked him up on some very cool butterfly identifying websites. He wasn't on them. So we kept him alive until he went into his cocoon.

Or partway into his cocoon anyway. Look at that. When a caterpillar makes a cocoon that has his butt hanging out, can you say he did a half-assed job?

His butt isn't hanging out of course, but the way he designed his cocoon - sleek on the top, rather form-fitting on the bottom - makes it look like he left it hanging out.

And it moved, too. If you picked him up, that little butt end would flip back and forth. He's been in there for over three weeks. Last week I showed him to my sister and told her that I change his soft grass every few days. I wondered in a half-joking voice if he was really dead, just having 'tremors' (maybe like a chicken's body after the head is removed?), and would be doing this for the next twenty years, and wouldn't that be funny? In a fully-joking-because-my-sister-is-a-nut voice, my sister said that she would think it was funny if I kept changing his grass for the next twenty years.

Tonight, while I was making pancakes, I heard Hannah say "I've never seen that kind of moth before."

Ho-ho! What's this?

Oh, he was gorgeous, just hanging there on that grass. He'd climbed out of the jar and onto the longer grass stems to dry his wings.

I wish I had better pictures, but this camera is just not working properly when it comes to light exposure in the house. I should get it looked at. Sometime.

He was big. As long as my pinkie. We took a few pictures (the ones of him drying out his fully spread out wings didn't turn out at all - his 'under wings' were hot pink - so pretty), inspected him with the magnifying glass (sucker had HUGE eyes), and then when his wings started doing a furious 'flying in place' type of movement, we ran him outside to the patch of weeds in the flower garden that he was found in. He took off (have I mentioned that he was quite big?) and Hannah cried about missing him for a few moments.

We're lucky she saw him when she did. We almost missed him altogether. After how strange I thought he was *in* his cocoon, to change his grass tomorrow and have him missing would have been even more strange. I do wish that I'd have noticed him sooner so that we could have done some actual gentle measurements and maybe had a better chance at getting good pictures, but that's the adult-homeschooling-parent in me talking. My little girl was thrilled by what she did get.

ETA:

Jessi asked in the comments what was left of his cocoon - I'm really glad she asked because I'd forgotten to look. I went and dug through the dry grass and the brown shell was there, with a white milky substance inside. I could manipulate the tail end and stretch it out quite a ways. Very cool.

My friend Lindsay fixed the pictures up for me. You can check out her pictures here and here. Much clearer. Thank you Lindsay!

Thursday, August 13, 2009

Do you see in macro?

A favorite blogger wrote this thread where she mentioned wondering if posting macro shots was honest or not. (In her opinion, it is.)

It made me think about the direction my own photos have taken as my blogging has progressed. Are my photographs that I show you predominantly macro, and if they are, is that necessarily a bad thing?

After looking back through several posts, I do think that my photographs lean toward the macro, but I don't think it is necessarily a bad thing. I have thought a lot about this in the last week since this blog is a journal of sorts of my parenting and homeschooling journey and I want it to be honest.

So when Ains was going through a chubby toddler phase and I couldn't stop taking pictures of her little hands building things but zoomed in just on those hands, was I "prettying things up"? I didn't consciously crop out the toy mess around her when she was playing with the blocks, I just aimed the camera at what I saw - what was important to me.

I had not realized until I thought about it over the last week, that over the past year, as my blogging focus has narrowed (I started this blog, not as a family blog, but as a journal of our journey - my family blog died a slow, lingering death once I started this one), my lens has narrowed also. I've allowed myself to tune out that mess for a bit and focus on my children playing. To zoom in on an especially ridiculous part of a dress-up outfit. To find, and highlight, the little bits of magic in our lives (the little bits that could easily be drowned in 'other'). I'll focus on the other later - on Snapshot Sunday, maybe.

But I haven't 'lost my focus' completely. Looking at snapshots that I took at the fair yesterday showed a nice blend of normal wide shots and macro shots.

While looking at these pictures, I noticed that I was trying to capture on film the details that had captured my eye when looking around. Some details *were* small, like the handle of that toy gun.

Some were bigger, like a girl blowing bubbles on her little sister's neck. Still, I left out the 'clutter' around her that I still remember - her dad telling her to be careful with the baby in the stands and then getting distracted by his sons walking along the backs of the benches. That wasn't important to me.

These cowboy boots and the little girl that wore them were adorable - I took one picture with her looking toward me and it didn't have the same feel to it. I didn't include the five adults gathered around her talking - her small body and the tiny boots drowned in that much action.

I didn't include the boys that this kid was obviously talking to (and roping, by the way). It's not a well set up shot, but it captures the essence of little cowboys.

As did this one. Three-year old cowboys are too cute for words, but between this picture and another full body shot I took of him, this one had the most punch.

And then there was this shot. I had several shots on my camera of macro views of this scenario, but this one, the shot that originally caught my eye, is what I kept. I didn't see the hose or the halter or the boy's boots when I first looked at this. I saw what you see here, and that's what I wanted to keep, to blog about.

So I guess what I'm saying is that I hadn't realized that I do this, that I have nurtured looking for beauty in my life to the point that it's not just the way I aim my lens anymore. It's the way I look at the world, so it's what you get when I share my world with you. Sometimes wide-angle, mostly (it seems to me) macro.

And I'd really like to know - especially if you're a lurker - do you like seeing shots like that? Do they feel honest or dishonest to you? Do they make you want to look for the beauty in your own life more? (One of my favorite blogs whose title, Ordinary Life Magic, says it all, was one of my inspirations for narrowing my focus.) How do you take shots for your own blogging goodness and memory keeping?

I'd really like to know. Because it's such an interesting idea - that your camera is not just there to take a group picture at a family get-together and record a basic memory, though those are priceless, or to take hundreds of carefully set-up wedding portraits (not that I'm bitter) but to record what the photographer is seeing, maybe even what they're feeling, definitely what's important to them, and what they want to share with those who might care.

Wednesday, August 12, 2009

Staying inside on a hot day.

That would be the smart thing to do. But it's not what we did today.

When we got up this morning, I had to hurry the kids faster than normal to get them out the door - we had a parade to go to! I kept saying "If you want to go to the parade, we have to brush teeth/fix hair/get dressed/find shoes/for-the-love-of-all-things-holy-you-have-to-wear-panties-or-pants-Ainsley ('tis a phase she's going through)/get snacks/fill up water bottles/get extra diapers for Gray."

Hannah said "Yeah, so we can get some candy!" Ainsley said "And see the DONKEYS!!!" So we got going and got there on time. Then we sat there in the hot sun while we waited for the parade to start. It was forty-five minutes late.

But there were donkeys. (Mules really, but I won't tell if you won't.)

And candy. And so much more. Go here to read about everything else in the parade.

After the parade, we headed to the fair to watch the gymkhana. We wanted to see little kids riding big horses.

These little boys were in the stands beside us. They told me that they were "going to be in the stick horse competitions. But we're going to get so muddy. Seriously. We're not even kidding. We won't be able to stop it." Inevitability can suck, can't it?

I didn't get a picture of Grayson looking adoringly at them. And then my five-year-old broke out of her shyness and offered them some of her parade candy. Bad boys have a strange attraction. Little boys want to be them, little girls want to share their candy with them.

We were going to hit the gymkhana and then go home, but Daddy called and asked us to stay for another four hours so that he could come have dinner with us.

I agreed. Because I wasn't thinking.

So we stayed and played.

And ate.

And made friends - if only for an hour.

And laughed.

And jumped.

And watched (really bad) puppet shows. The man wasn't even trying to hide the fact that it was his own voice. Ainsley didn't care because it was a talking DOG, but Hannah found it 'pretty lame' which I found pretty funny because just six months ago it would have been a talking dog for her also. Grayson just clapped.

Then there was karaoke. You couldn't set this one up any better, down to his socks.

He wasn't that good, but he was brave and loud. That counts for something.

We talked to the sheep.

Mother turned into a crusty adult and told some kids with no parents around to quit poking the turkeys in the small pens with sticks.

We kept track of the day's activities.

"Saw sheep? Check. Saw man singing? Check. Jumped in jump house? Check. Mother, I haven't been able to check 'eat ice cream' off my list yet. We'd better do that soon." Check.

We explored.
And went back for more karaoke. This little kid who still had a high voice was singing Kenny Chesney. He rocked the house.

And Grayson clapped.

Another man sang several Johnny Cash songs, including a few slow ones that I've never heard before that had Ainsley swaying around like she was listening to a lullaby.

We read - and read - and read.

It was too hot to leave the tents for very long. We visited all of the exhibits in the air-conditioned buildings. I even attempted the vendor building but skedaddled out of there after just one aisle. (That was partly because wrangling three kids - Gray was scorning the backpack by then - through tables filled with just-at-their-height goodies was daunting and partly because of the 'Save Morality!!!' table with the 'There never were dinosaurs, it's all a plot by the ATHEISTS!' table that I could see around the corner on the next aisle. Explain that one to Hannah? No thank-you. Not today.)

Finally, Daddy came, we ate dinner, and came home. A bit anti-climatic, no?

So here we are.

Home.